This is the original oral argument of Roe v. Wade before the Supreme Court in 1971. Mrs. Weddington is the attorney representing the interests of "Jane Roe" or Norma McCorvey. Mr. Floyd represents the interests of the State of Texas.


Roe v. Wade Argument

Not yet saved

Browser Person

From what provisions of the Constitution does Mrs. Weddington draw to claim a right to privacy?
According to Mrs. Weddington, when does the Constitution attach protection to persons?
According to Mr. Floyd, when does a woman have a choice?
What is the state of Texas' compelling interest in this case?
At what point does life begin, according to the Texas Statute?
According to Mr. Floyd, is the freedom over one's body absolute? What examples are given?



Opinion

For the following questions, refer to the Court's written opinion.

What trimester system did the Court develop within which to understand the limits of state power and individual freedom?
What parameters did the Court place on the right to privacy?